Data driven audio enhancement

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are disclosed for audio enhancement. For example, methods may include accessing audio data; determining a window of audio samples based on the audio data; inputting the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification, in which the classifier includes a neural network and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio; selecting, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; applying the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification; and storing, playing, or transmitting an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/016,043, filed on Jun. 22, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to data driven audio enhancement.

BACKGROUND

The world watches, and listens to, a huge volume of video. For example, one provider, YouTube, has a catalog of over 7 billion videos, representing about 200,000 years of video. More than 300 hours of new video content are uploaded to YouTube every second. YouTube, along with many other video sharing services, highlight video sharing as a major service element. The video content itself is a mixture of professionally produced and amateur material. The professional material—films and trailers, music videos and all kinds of drama, comedy and commentary are produced in video studios with high quality audio equipment, carefully controlled acoustics and minimal extraneous noise. However, the great majority of video uploads are amateur productions, captured on smartphones and uploaded with little or no editing. In a recent month, 58% of all internet users had uploaded a video during the month.

SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are implementations of data driven audio enhancement.

In a first aspect, the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in systems that include a processing apparatus that is configured to: access audio data; determine a window of audio samples based on the audio data; input the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification, in which the classifier includes a neural network and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio that includes a speech class and a music class; select, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; apply the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification; and store, play, or transmit an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment.

In a second aspect, the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include accessing audio data; determining a window of audio samples based on the audio data; inputting the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification, in which the classifier includes a neural network and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio; selecting, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; applying the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification; and storing, playing, or transmitting an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment.

In a third aspect, the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include accessing AV data that includes one or more visual tracks and one or more audio tracks; extracting audio data from the AV data; determining a window of audio samples based on the audio data; applying an audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals; merging an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment with a visual track from the AV data; and storing, playing, or transmitting the enhanced audio signal based.

In a fourth aspect, the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods for training a neural network for speech enhancement that include applying room acoustic models to clean speech signals from a corpus of clean speech signals to obtain dirty speech signals; training the neural network using the dirty speech signals as training inputs with feedback based on a loss function comparing resulting enhanced audio signals to corresponding clean speech signals from the corpus of clean speech signals; and storing or transmitting the neural network.

These and other aspects of the present disclosure are disclosed in the following detailed description, the appended claims, and the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawings are not to-scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example of a system for data driven audio enhancement.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of a system for training a speech enhancement network.

FIG. 3A is a block diagram of an example of a system configured for video capture with data driven audio enhancement.

FIG. 3B is a block diagram of an example of a system configured for video capture with data driven audio enhancement.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example of a system configured for data driven audio enhancement.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an example of a process for data driven audio enhancement.

FIG. 6A is an illustration of an example of audio enhancement processing for a window of audio samples to generate an enhanced audio segment.

FIG. 6B is an illustration of an example of audio enhancement processing for overlapping windows of audio samples to generate overlapping enhanced audio segments.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an example of a process for training a speech enhancement network.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This document includes disclosure of systems and methods for data driven audio enhancement. The disclosed audio enhancement techniques may be employed for a variety of audio signals, such as, for example an audio track of a video. Often video is captured in high noise environments (e.g., at children's birthday celebrations, in backyards, at parties in restaurants and clubs, and in all kinds of events out on the streets and in parks) with low quality recording equipment. Unfortunately, the quality of the audio recordings may make these audio signals difficult to understand or uncomfortable to listen to. Amateur video recording often suffers from microphone distortion, heavy background noise, pronounced wind noise, and reverberation. For example, an automated system is disclosed to significantly improve the audio quality, especially the speech quality, of video recordings, reducing the background noise, improving clarity (e.g., speech clarity), and rendering the audio associated with a video more intelligible.

Benefits of audio quality enhancement, especially speech enhancement, are not limited to amateur video. For example, almost any audio recording (e.g., a video recording) outside of a studio, is likely to face impairments to speech intelligibility. From-the-scene news reports, for example, may still have to contend with significant background noise and other acoustic impairments.

First the audio may be classified into different time segments, with different dominant audio content (e.g., speech segments, music segments and other segments) such that different audio processing algorithms can be applied to each type of content. Second, content-specific audio processing algorithms employed may be learned processing functions using deep neural networks (DNNs) to learn to a fuller set of transformations to separate a rich mix of different noises and acoustic impairments from the rich mix of sounds to be retained (e.g., retention of speech sounds to improve speech intelligibility).

The disclosed systems may fit flexibly into the current pattern of typical audio (e.g., video) production, storage and consumption. The audio enhancement method can be implemented on-the-fly as part of the original audio recording, as a transformation applied where the audio is stored for sharing (e.g., in a cloud-based video access site, or on-the-fly as part of the video player, when the viewer is listening to the video).

The proposed techniques and systems for data driven audio enhancement may offer advantages over conventional audio processing systems. For example, using a classifier to classify audio by time segment and select an enhancement network trained to enhance particular types of audio signals may improve enhanced audio quality and/or simplify training for the individual audio enhancement networks. For example, application of an environment specific model for enhancement of audio from such environment may provide an advantage given the training and testing conditions are well matched. For example, training of an audio enhancement network may be achieved with less training examples by using data augmentation based on a collection of room acoustic models. Some implementations may provide speaker identification and/or customization for particular users.

As used herein, the term “AV data” refers to a data structure (e.g., a file or a bitstream) that includes visual data (e.g., one or more visual tracks) and audio data (e.g., one or more audio tracks) that are associated with a video. The tracks of an AV data may be synchronized. The tracks of an AV data may be encoded (e.g., using a compression algorithm). Some examples of AV data are a MP4 file or a MOV file.

Implementations are described in detail with reference to the drawings, which are provided as examples to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosed technology. The figures and examples are not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure to a single implementation or embodiment, and other implementations and embodiments are possible by way of interchange of, or combination with, some or all of the described or illustrated elements. Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to same or like parts.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example of a system 100 for data driven audio enhancement. The system 100 includes an audio extraction module 110; an audio segmentation and classification module 120; a set of audio enhancement networks including a speech enhancement network 130, a music enhancement network 132, and a noise enhancement network 134; and a merging module 140. The system 100 may extract an audio track 112 from a video 102, classify the different types of audio content (e.g., speech, music, noise and other types) in that track, processes the respective content types (e.g., the speech content) to improve intelligibility, and recombine a visual track 114 with the new audio track to create the enhanced video 142. For example, the system 100 may be implement the process 500 of FIG. 5. For example, the system 100 may be implemented as part of the system 300 of FIG. 3A. For example, the system 100 may be implemented as part of the system 330 of FIG. 3B. For example, the system 100 may be implemented as part of the system 400 of FIG. 4.

The system 100 includes an audio extraction module 110 that accesses audio data included with video 102. For example, in typical video formats such as MP4 and MOV, an encoded visual track 114 and one or more encoded audio tracks are stored together in the same file. The audio extraction module 110 may parse the file structure using standard interfaces, to acquire an audio track 112. The audio track 112 may then be decompressed into a pulse-coded modulation representation, where each audio channel is expressed by a stream or sequence of sampled values representing the magnitude of the waveform at some at regular frequency, where that frequency is the sample rate. If the audio has multiple channels, the channels may be kept separate or may be combined (e.g., averaged) to form a single monaural channel. For example, the system 100 may operate at a single sampling rate, or for a small set of different sample rates. Audio tracks received at a different sampling rate may be resampled into the most appropriate of the sampling rates supported by the audio. An output of the audio extraction module 110 may include one or more decompressed, combined, resampled audio tracks 112, which is ready for segmentation and classification.

The system 100 includes an audio segmentation and classification module 120. For example, classification of the audio content type may be performed by a classifier, including a deep neural network trained for designation of a primary audio type for each segment or window of the one or more audio tracks 112. The classifier may attempt to identify windows of samples of an appropriate duration for useful enhancement. The classification granularity (i.e., window duration) should not be so coarse that significant material at a type boundary is misclassified and therefore not passed through the right type of audio enhancer. Similarly, granularity should not be so fine that very short intervals, especially short intervals of noise within larger speech segments are classified as separate types. In some implementations, the audio segmentation and classification module 120 may use a fixed classification granularity, typically of 1-5 seconds. The windows of samples for classification may overlap or may be disjoint. In some implementations, the audio segmentation and classification module 120 may search for a more precise boundary between content types.

The audio segmentation might also break the audio up into non-temporal segments. For example, a beam forming algorithm can be used to break an input audio track into two tracks, representing potentially temporally overlapping signals, each resultant audio track can be processed separately and then the two resultant enhanced audio signals can be combined and/or merged together after classification and enhancement. For example, an audio track with speech coming from one spatial location and music from another can use the speech network on the speech component and the music network on the music.

The classifier of the audio segmentation and classification module 120 may be trained on some number of content types, where the number is determined by a number of distinct enhancement strategies to be applied. We illustrate a typical system here, using three classes: “speech”, “music” and “other”, but similar systems can accommodate fewer or more categories. For example, the “other” category, may include segments with just noise, silence or other material for which specific enhancement is unavailable or is undesired. Any given segment of audio may include a mix of audio types, for example, speech with added noise, music with added speech or noise with faint background music. The classifier assesses the mix of audio content in each segment to identify a dominant or primary audio type, and one or more secondary audio types. Those combinations of primary and secondary types may be used to select an audio enhancement network (130, 132, or 134) using a policy matrix, like the one shown below in Table 1, for choosing between two available enhancement methods, a speech enhancer (“SE”)

TABLE 1 An example of content processing policy matrix and a music enhancer (“ME”). Secondary content Speech Music Other Primary Speech SE SE SE Music ME ME ME Other SE ME SE

An example of one possible policy matrix is shown in Table 1.

More complex policy matrices are possible using additional criteria, such as a pattern of classifications for preceding and following segments, more levels of content detection and more categories. For example, an implementation of the system 100 may want to distinguish between different types of noise—wind noise, speech babble noise, or traffic noise, or among different types of music, to apply different algorithms for correction of background noise or acoustic interference. In some implementations, outputs of multiple speech enhancers tailored towards detected classes may be combined (e.g., using weighted average) in a probabilistic fashion (e.g., based on class probabilities determined by a soft classifier).

The classifier of the audio segmentation and classification module 120 may include trained deep neural network functions that map from the space of windows of audio samples to a classification (e.g. speech or music or noise) of the audio type for that segment. The classification confidence (e.g., a softmax function of the individual class weights) can also be used to bias policy matrix choices by changing the tendency towards false positives or false negatives for a given classification. (For example, in the face of ambiguity of whether a given audio segment is better considered music or speech, the confidence factor can be used in the classification matrix decision to make borderline segments be treated as speech instead of music. The classifier itself may be a multi-layer deep neural network, trained by stochastic steepest descent loss function optimization. The training data set may contain both audio examples with naturally occurring content mixes (e.g. primary speech+secondary music) and reverberation, and audio examples artificially composed from a mix of pure examples (clean speech, clean music, and noise).

The system 100 includes a speech enhancement network 130 that may be trained to determine an enhanced speech segment 131 based on a window of audio samples 121 for which the speech enhancement network 130 has been selected based on a classification of the window of audio samples 121 determined by the audio segmentation and classification module 120. Speech enhancement may be a difficult and sophisticated audio enhancement method in the system 100. For example, the speech enhancement network 130 may be a learned system, using deep neural network structures trained on a wide variety of speech impaired by noise, speech babble, music and acoustic reverberation to cover the wide range possible speech inputs. The training of the deep neural network may be key to its success in mapping noisy, reverberant speech into cleaner speech with less reverberation. An example of a structure of a training process is shown in FIG. 2. For example, the process 700 of FIG. 7 may be implemented to train a neural network of the speech enhancement network 130.

For example, a window of audio samples 121 may be processed into a mix of temporal and spectral features used by a deep neural network from which enhanced speech segment 131 is filtered and regenerated. For example, evaluation of the enhancement deep neural network may operate on an input span of 0.5 seconds to 2 seconds of noisy audio. This window duration may create an input audio context that spans multiple speech phonemes and even multiple words. By spanning more phonemes, the network may be provided sufficient contextual information to allow the model to capture statistically frequent sound and even word usage patterns in a target language. In addition, complex noise patterns can effectively be learned to assist in removal of these interferers. Together, the speech enhancement network 130 may disambiguate speech from noise more effectively and even partially reconstruct the more plausible missing speech sounds if they have been completely masked by noise. The speech enhancement network 130 may operate on just the current input samples, and samples in the past, or may operate on current sample, and samples both before and after the current time. Looking “ahead” by some hundreds of milliseconds the accuracy can be improved, but this technique may increase the latency of the system 100 by the extent of look ahead. In some implementations, a deep neural network of the speech enhancement network 130 is applied to overlapping input audio segments. For example, a deep neural network may be applied as illustrated by FIG. 6B. The input overlaps may be chosen to both provide sufficient context for speech reconstruction and to allow the output windows to overlap. For example, overlapping output windows may be combined by averaging (e.g., using a weighted average) the results sample by sample. This technique may increase continuity and reduce audio artifacts in the enhanced speech segment 131.

In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 1), the system 100 is augmented to include multiple speech enhancement networks that are tailored for different types of speech signals. For example, the system may include a general speech enhancement network, a child speech enhancement network, a wind-impaired speech enhancement network, and/or speaker-specific speech enhancement networks that are adapted to the speech of individual users. These multiple speech enhancement networks may be selected for application to an audio segment based on one or more classifications and/or a speaker identification. In some implementations, multiple speech enhancement networks may be applied concurrently, with their outputs combined in a probabilistic fashion (e.g., based on estimated probabilities of the presence of different types of speech and noise sources).

The system 100 includes a music enhancement network 132 that may be trained to determine an enhanced music segment 133 based on a window of audio samples 123 for which the music enhancement network 132 has been selected based on a classification of the window of audio samples 123 determined by the audio segmentation and classification module 120. Music enhancement may follow a similar strategy and structure as speech enhancement, but where the goal is to remove interfering background speech and noise from dominant music content. A clean music corpus for training the music enhancement network 132 may be gathered from available music libraries, and many of the same noise interference sources from speech enhancement can be used as well.

The system 100 includes a noise enhancement network 134 that may be trained to determine an enhanced noise segment 135 based on a window of audio samples 125 for which the noise enhancement network 134 has been selected based on a classification of the window of audio samples 125 determined by the audio segmentation and classification module 120. For example, the noise enhancement network may be configured to suppress a noisy portion of the audio track 112 by scaling the signal down. In some implementations, may pass an audio segment 135 with little or no modification of corresponding samples from the window of audio samples 125 in order to avoid introducing additional distortion.

The system 100 includes a merging module 140 that may be configured to combine the enhanced audio segments from the audio enhancement networks (130, 132, and 134) into one or more audio tracks that may be re-synchronized with the visual track 114 and/or encoded (e.g., according to a standardized AV data format, such as MP4 or MOV) to generate enhanced video 142. For example, as each segment of audio is passed through the appropriate enhancer (130, 132, or 134), it is reconstructed into a continuous audio stream, recompressed according to the requirements of the original AV data format and recombined with the video image sequence content of the visual track 114. This structure is then mapped to a file or to a stream as required by an end application (e.g., video storage or video playback).

In some usage scenarios multiple types of distortions are present. In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 1), a soft classification is determined that estimates what types of noise sources are present in the current window of audio samples (e.g., wind, street, competing talker) and with what probabilities. A corresponding enhanced audio segment may be determined based on a linear combination of the outputs of audio enhancement networks tailored to detecting and suppressing respective sources of noise and distortions (e.g., wind, street and competing talker attenuation), where the linear combination is determined with weights that are based on probabilities of these respective sources of noise and distortion. This type of probabilistic fusion of outputs from multiple audio enhancement networks (e.g., speech enhancement networks) may be well suited for enhancement of real-life mixtures where multiple noise sources are present, although this approach may consume more computing resources in order to run multiple audio enhancement networks in parallel.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of a system 200 for training a speech enhancement network. The system 200 includes a clean speech classifier 210 that is configured to process raw speech samples from a raw speech corpus 202 and select examples with low noise or other distortions for inclusion in a clean speech corpus 212. For example, the clean speech corpus 212 may be a collection of hundreds of thousands of examples of English speech, totaling tens of thousands of hours of unique speech from thousands of different speakers. The sources may be chosen to be to be as free as possible of background noise and reverberation. Sources of audio in the raw speech corpus 202 may include, for example, the open collection of TED lectures, the LibriSpeech database of audio books, examples from the United States Library of Congress. Sources may be selected from a collected raw speech corpus 202 by pre-filtering through a clean speech classifier 210, which may be similar to the content type classifier described in relation to the audio segmentation and classification module 120 of FIG. 1. In some implementations, only content with high confidence of being clean is passed into the clean speech corpus 212 for inclusion in the building of speech mixes.

A noise corpus 214 is also collected from many sources for background noise, including recordings from cafes, streets, construction sites, cars, airplanes, bars, and video and audio production sound effects. Common human-generated non-speech noises, such as laughter and applause are included in the noise corpus 214.

The room acoustic models 216 are another feature used for training data augmentation. A room acoustic model is used to generate a set of room impulse responses for a set of spatially distributed acoustic sources. Each room impulse response represents the magnitude and delay of audio reflections off the surfaces of the modeled room at the receiver location. In a large space with highly reflective surfaces, a single sound may echo for more than a second, as the sound waves bounce back and forth in the room. Smaller rooms have faster reverberations and more absorbent materials have lower magnitude reflections. Moreover, room materials may have non-uniform frequency response, absorbing some frequency bands more than others. A highly reverberant room may muddle the speech making it significantly less comprehensible because at each moment the original direct speech source is combined with the delayed echoes from all the sounds in the room. For example, thousands of different room acoustic models may be constructed representing a wide diversity of listening environments.

The system 200 includes a speech combiner 220 that is configured to select a clean speech example from the clean speech corpus 212, one or more interfering noise examples from the noise corpus 214, and a room acoustic model from the room acoustic models 216. For example, the noise may be combined with the speech by simple linear combination (additive noise) or may use a more complex combination function to represent the effects of microphone saturation or the Lombard effect, where by speakers raise their voices in the presence of noise. In some implementations the room acoustic model is applied to the combination to create realistic speech+noise interference mixes. In some implementations, the room acoustic model may also be applied separately to each of the speech and noise components, before combining them, in order to approximate different speaker and noise source locations in the acoustic space. For example, multiple acoustic sources (e.g., speech, maskers, and/or noises) may be spatially separated. Separate room impulse responses may be determined, using one of the room acoustic models 216, for respective acoustic sources. These room impulse responses may essentially describe the linear filtering that when applied to (e.g., anechoic) acoustic signals would produce the signal observed at the acoustic receiver (e.g., microphone) location. That is, at the microphone location, the acoustic signal arrives via many paths with different delays and attenuations. These signals convolved with the room impulse responses may be combined (e.g., linearly combined) at the microphone location. The combined signal may be a simulated mixture at the microphone location, which may be used as a dirty speech 222 signal.

The dirty speech 222 signals are used by a model training module 230 for training a speech enhancement network (e.g., including a neural network). The speech enhancement network outputs enhanced speech 232 in response to a dirty speech 222 signal. A loss function module 240 determines an error signal based on the enhanced speech 232 and a corresponding clean speech signal that was used to generate the dirty speech 222. This error signal is used by the model training module 130 as feedback for training the speech enhancement network. For example, the model training module may implement a backpropagation algorithm to update parameters (e.g. coefficients) of the speech enhancement network based on the error signals from the loss function module 240.

By combining many permutations of the available clean speech samples, noise source samples, and room acoustic models, from a large set of speech and noise corpora (212 and 214) a very large set of diverse but realistic training data inputs may be generated as dirty speech 222 samples. The typical training a single speech enhancement deep neural network may train on hundreds of thousands of hours of dirty speech 222 content to achieve high quality speech enhancement.

FIG. 3A is a block diagram of an example of a system 300 configured for data driven audio enhancement. The system 300 includes a video capture device 310 (e.g., a camera or a drone) that includes a processing apparatus 312 that is configured to receive images from one or more image sensors 314 and audio from one or more microphones 316. The processing apparatus 312 may include an audio classifier and multiple audio enhancement networks (e.g., implemented as a software module or a specialized hardware module) configured to classify and enhance segments of audio captured by the one or more microphones 316. The processing apparatus 312 may be configured to use the classifier to selectively apply the audio enhancement networks to the audio captured using the one or more microphones 316 to obtain enhanced audio segments that can be combined and/or merged, with a visual track, to form enhanced video. The video capture device 310 includes one or more motion sensors 318 configured to detect motion of the one or more image sensors 314 and the one or more microphones 316. The video capture device 310 includes a user interface 320, which may allow a user to control video capture functions and/or view video. The video capture device 310 includes a communications interface 322 for transferring video to other devices. The video capture device 310 includes a battery 324 for powering the video capture device 310. For example, the system 300 may be used to implement processes described in this disclosure, such as the process 500 of FIG. 5 and/or the process 700 of FIG. 7.

The processing apparatus 312 may include one or more processors having single or multiple processing cores. The processing apparatus 312 may include memory, such as a random-access memory (RAM) device, flash memory, or any other suitable type of storage device, such as a non-transitory computer readable memory. The memory of the processing apparatus 312 may include executable instructions and data that can be accessed by one or more processors of the processing apparatus 312. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may include one or more DRAM modules, such as double data rate synchronous dynamic random-access memory (DDR SDRAM). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 312 may include a graphical processing unit (GPU). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 312 may include a digital signal processor (DSP). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 312 may include an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). For example, the processing apparatus 312 may include a custom audio signal processor. In some implementations, the processing apparatus 312 may have multiple processing units in different portions of the video capture device 310.

The processing apparatus 312 may include an audio classifier and multiple audio enhancement networks (e.g., a speech enhancement network and/or a music enhancement network) configured to reduce noise and distortion of audio signals captured using the one or more microphones 316. For example, the audio classifier and the multiple audio enhancement networks may be implemented by software executed by the processing apparatus 312. The processing apparatus 312 may be configured to access audio data; determine a window of audio samples based on the audio data; input the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification, in which the classifier includes a neural network and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio that includes a speech class and a music class; select, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; apply the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification; and store, play, or transmit an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to determine, using the classifier, a secondary classification based on the window of audio samples; and select, based on the secondary classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to select, based on a classification and a secondary classification output by the classifier for another window of audio samples from the audio data, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to extract the audio data from AV data; and merge the enhanced audio signal with a visual track from the AV data. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to detect a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and input data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the classifier, in which the classification depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to detect a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and input data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the selected audio enhancement network, in which the enhanced audio segment depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to determine a sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples, including the window of audio samples, based on the audio data; determine a sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including the enhanced audio segment, based on the sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples using the classifier and at least two of the audio enhancement networks from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks; and determine an enhanced audio signal by blending the sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including combining (e.g., using weighted averaging) corresponding samples from multiple segments in overlapping portions of the enhanced audio segments. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to determine a residual noise signal as a difference between an audio signal from the audio data and the enhanced audio signal; and merge the enhanced audio signal with the residual noise signal. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to input the window of audio samples to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, in which the speaker identification network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users; and select, based on the speaker identification, the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a person associated with the speaker identification. For example, the processing apparatus 312 may be configured to input the window of audio samples to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, in which the speaker identification network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users; and select, based on the speaker identification, the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a speaker-specific embedding associated with the speaker identification. In some implementations, the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals that have been augmented using room acoustic models. For example, the speech enhancement network may be trained by implementing the process 700 of FIG. 7.

The one or more image sensors 314 are configured to capture images. The one or more image sensors 314 are configured to detect light of a certain spectrum (e.g., the visible spectrum or the infrared spectrum) and convey information constituting an image as electrical signals (e.g., analog or digital signals). For example, the one or more image sensors 314 may include charge-coupled devices (CCD) or active pixel sensors in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductors (CMOS). The one or more image sensors 314 may detect light incident through respective lens (e.g., a fisheye lens). In some implementations, the one or more image sensors 314 include digital-to-analog converters. In some implementations, the one or more image sensors 314 have respective fields of view that overlap. The one or more image sensors 314 are attached to the processing apparatus 312 as components of the video capture device 310.

The one or more microphones 316 are configured to capture the audio data. The audio data may include one or more audio tracks that are synchronized with one or more visual tracks captured by the one or more image sensors 314. The one or more microphones 316 may convert sound waves incident on the one or more microphones 316 into one or more digital audio recordings. The one or more microphones 316 may detect sound and convey information constituting an audio signal as electrical signals (e.g., analog or digital signals). In some implementations, the one or more microphones 316 include an analog-to-digital converter. The one or more microphones 316 may include a microphone configured to capture sound in a vicinity of the video capture device 310. In some implementations, the one or more microphones 316 include an array of microphones to enable beamforming processing of sound incident on the one or more microphones 316.

The one or more motion sensors 318 are configured to detect motion of the one or more image sensors 314 and/or the one or more microphones 316. For example, the one or more motion sensors 318 may include parts of an inertial measurement unit (e.g., including gyroscopes, accelerometers, and/or magnetometers) that is mounted in a housing with the one or more image sensors 314 and the one or more microphones 316. The processing apparatus 312 may be configured to determine a sequence of orientation estimates based on sensor data from the one or more motion sensors 318. For example, determining the sequence of orientation estimates may include applying quadratic estimation to sensor data from a plurality of the one or more motion sensors 318.

The video capture device 310 may include a user interface 320. For example, the user interface 320 may include an LCD display and one or more speakers for presenting video and/or messages to a user. For example, the user interface 320 may include a button or switch enabling a person to manually turn the video capture device 310 on and off. For example, the user interface 320 may include a record button for controlling video capture.

The video capture device 310 may include a communications interface 322, which may enable communications with a personal computing device (e.g., a smartphone, a tablet, a laptop computer, or a desktop computer). For example, the communications interface 322 may be used to receive commands controlling video capture and processing in the video capture device 310. For example, the communications interface 322 may be used to transfer AV data to a personal computing device. For example, the communications interface 322 may include a wired interface, such as a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), a universal serial bus (USB) interface, or a FireWire interface. For example, the communications interface 322 may include a wireless interface, such as a Bluetooth interface, a ZigBee interface, and/or a Wi-Fi interface.

The video capture device 310 may include a battery 324 that powers the video capture device 310 and/or its peripherals. For example, the battery 324 may be charged wirelessly or through a micro-USE interface.

FIG. 3B is a block diagram of an example of a system 330 configured for data driven audio enhancement. The system 330 includes a video capture device 340 and a personal computing device 360 that communicate via a communications link 350. The video capture device 340 includes one or more image sensors 342 and one or more microphones 346 that are configured to capture video. The video capture device 340 includes a communications interface 348 configured to transfer AV data via the communication link 350 to the personal computing device 360. The personal computing device 360 includes a processing apparatus 362 that is configured to receive, using the communications interface 366, images from the one or more image sensors 342 and audio data from the one or more microphones 346. The video capture device 340 includes a fastening article 344 attached to the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 and configured to hold the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 in place on a portion (e.g., a head, a chest, or an arm) of a human body. The processing apparatus 362 may include an audio classifier and multiple audio enhancement networks (e.g., implemented as a software module or a specialized hardware module) configured to classify and enhance segments of audio captured by the one or more microphones 346. The processing apparatus 362 may be configured to use the classifier to selectively apply the audio enhancement networks to the audio captured using the one or more microphones 346 to obtain enhanced audio segments that can be combined and/or merged, with a visual track, to form enhanced video. For example, the system 330 may be used to implement processes described in this disclosure, such as the process 500 of FIG. 5 and/or the process 700 of FIG. 7.

The one or more image sensors 342 are configured to capture images. The one or more image sensors 342 are configured to detect light of a certain spectrum (e.g., the visible spectrum or the infrared spectrum) and convey information constituting an image as electrical signals (e.g., analog or digital signals). For example, the one or more image sensors 342 may include charge-coupled devices (CCD) or active pixel sensors in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductors (CMOS). The one or more image sensors 342 may detect light incident through respective lenses (e.g., a fisheye lens). In some implementations, the one or more image sensors 342 include digital-to-analog converters. In some implementations, the one or more image sensors 342 have respective fields of view that overlap.

The fastening article 344 is attached to the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 and configured to hold the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 in place on a portion of a human body. For example, the fastening article 344 may include glasses or goggles that, when worn by a human, fasten the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 in place on a head of the human. For example, the fastening article 344 may include a wristband that, when worn by a human, fastens the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 in place on an arm of the human. For example, the fastening article 344 may include a shirt or vest that, when worn by a human, fastens the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 in place on a chest of the human. For example, the fastening article 344 may include a band or strap of a headset configured for augmented reality applications and/or virtual reality applications that, when worn by a human, fastens the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346 in place on a head of the human.

The one or more microphones 346 are configured to capture the audio data. The audio data may include one or more audio tracks that are synchronized with one or more visual tracks captured by the one or more image sensors 342. The one or more microphones 346 may convert sound waves incident on the one or more microphones 346 into one or more digital audio recordings. The one or more microphones 346 may detect sound and convey information constituting an audio signal as electrical signals (e.g., analog or digital signals). In some implementations, the one or more microphones 346 include an analog-to-digital converter. The one or more microphones 346 may include a microphone configured to capture sound in a vicinity of the video capture device 340. In some implementations, the one or more microphones 346 include an array of microphones to enable beamforming processing of sound incident on the one or more microphones 346.

The communications link 350 may be a wired communications link or a wireless communications link. The communications interface 348 and the communications interface 366 may enable communications over the communications link 350. For example, the communications interface 348 and the communications interface 366 may include a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), a universal serial bus (USB) interface, a FireWire interface, a Bluetooth interface, a ZigBee interface, and/or a Wi-Fi interface. For example, the communications interface 348 and the communications interface 366 may be used to transfer AV data from the video capture device 340 to the personal computing device 360 for signal processing (e.g., audio enhancement, filtering, tone mapping, stitching, encoding) to generate output images and/or metadata based on AV data from the one or more image sensors 342 and the one or more microphones 346. For example, the communications interface 348 and the communications interface 366 may be used to transfer control signals to the video capture device 340 from the personal computing device 360 for controlling capture of video.

The processing apparatus 362 may include one or more processors having single or multiple processing cores. The processing apparatus 362 may include memory, such as a random-access memory (RAM) device, flash memory, or any other suitable type of storage device, such as a non-transitory computer readable memory. The memory of the processing apparatus 362 may include executable instructions and data that can be accessed by one or more processors of the processing apparatus 362. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may include one or more DRAM modules, such as double data rate synchronous dynamic random-access memory (DDR SDRAM). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 362 may include a graphical processing unit (GPU). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 362 may include a digital signal processor (DSP). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 362 may include an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). For example, the processing apparatus 362 may include a custom image signal processor.

The processing apparatus 362 may include an audio classifier and multiple audio enhancement networks (e.g., a speech enhancement network and/or a music enhancement network) configured to reduce noise and distortion of audio signals captured using the one or more microphones 346. For example, the audio classifier and the multiple audio enhancement networks may be implemented by software executed by the processing apparatus 362. The processing apparatus 362 may be configured to access audio data; determine a window of audio samples based on the audio data; input the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification, in which the classifier includes a neural network and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio that includes a speech class and a music class; select, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; apply the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification; and store, play, or transmit an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to determine, using the classifier, a secondary classification based on the window of audio samples; and select, based on the secondary classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to select, based on a classification and a secondary classification output by the classifier for another window of audio samples from the audio data, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to extract the audio data from AV data; and merge the enhanced audio signal with a visual track from the AV data. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to detect a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and input data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the classifier, in which the classification depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to detect a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and input data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the selected audio enhancement network, in which the enhanced audio segment depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to determine a sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples, including the window of audio samples, based on the audio data; determine a sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including the enhanced audio segment, based on the sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples using the classifier and at least two of the audio enhancement networks from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks; and determine an enhanced audio signal by blending the sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including combining (e.g., using weighted averaging) corresponding samples from multiple segments in overlapping portions of the enhanced audio segments. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to determine a residual noise signal as a difference between an audio signal from the audio data and the enhanced audio signal; and merge the enhanced audio signal with the residual noise signal. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to input the window of audio samples to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, in which the speaker identification network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users; and select, based on the speaker identification, the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a person associated with the speaker identification. For example, the processing apparatus 362 may be configured to input the window of audio samples to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, in which the speaker identification network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users; and select, based on the speaker identification, the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a speaker-specific embedding associated with the speaker identification. In some implementations, the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals that have been augmented using room acoustic models. For example, the speech enhancement network may be trained by implementing the process 700 of FIG. 7.

The personal computing device 360 may include a user interface 364. For example, the user interface 364 may include a touchscreen display and one or more speakers for presenting video and/or messages to a user and receiving commands from a user. For example, the user interface 364 may include goggles or a headset with a display configured to support augmented reality applications. For example, the user interface 364 may include a button or switch enabling a person to manually turn the personal computing device 360 on and off. In some implementations, commands (e.g., start recording video, stop recording video, or snap photograph) received via the user interface 364 may be passed on to the video capture device 340 via the communications link 350.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example of a system 400 configured for data driven audio enhancement. The system 400 includes a media server 410 that stores and provides access (e.g., for download or streaming) to media files (e.g., video files and/or other audio files). The media server 410 includes a data storage 412 and a network communications interface 414. The system 400 includes a computing device 430 that is configured to provide an audio enhancement service for stored audio (e.g., audio tracks from video). The computing device 430 includes a processing apparatus 432, a user interface 434, and a network communications interface 436. The computing device 430 may communicate with the media server 410 via a network communications link 420. The processing apparatus may be configured to apply audio enhancement processing to audio data stored by the media server 410 to update files on the media server 410 with enhanced audio and/or to enhance audio on demand for presentation via speakers of the user interface 434 (e.g., the audio enhancement may be integrated with a local audio playback function). For example, the system 400 may be used to implement processes described in this disclosure, such as the process 500 of FIG. 5 and/or the process 700 of FIG. 7.

The media server includes a data storage 412. The data storage may be used to store video files or other types of audio files. For example, the data storage 412 may include a non-volatile information storage device such as a hard drive, a solid-state drive, a read-only memory device (ROM), an optical disc, a magnetic disc, or any other suitable type of storage device such as a non-transitory computer readable memory. The data storage 412 may include another type of device, or multiple devices, capable of storing data (e.g., AV data or other audio data) for retrieval or processing.

The media server includes a network communications interface 414. The network communications interface 414 may enable remote access to AV data or other audio data stored on in the data storage 412. For example, the network communications interface 414 may implement one or more network communications protocols (e.g., Ethernet, WiFi, SONET, 1Pv4 and/or 1Pv6 protocols).

The computing device 430 includes a processing apparatus 432. The processing apparatus 432 may include one or more processors having single or multiple processing cores. The processing apparatus 432 may include memory, such as a random-access memory (RAM) device, flash memory, or any other suitable type of storage device, such as a non-transitory computer readable memory. The memory of the processing apparatus 432 may include executable instructions and data that can be accessed by one or more processors of the processing apparatus 432. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may include one or more DRAM modules, such as double data rate synchronous dynamic random-access memory (DDR SDRAM). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 432 may include a graphical processing unit (GPU). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 432 may include a digital signal processor (DSP). In some implementations, the processing apparatus 432 may include an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). For example, the processing apparatus 432 may include a custom image signal processor.

The processing apparatus 432 may include an audio classifier and multiple audio enhancement networks (e.g., a speech enhancement network and/or a music enhancement network) configured to reduce noise and distortion of audio signals stored by the media server 410. For example, the audio classifier and the multiple audio enhancement networks may be implemented by software executed by the processing apparatus 432. The processing apparatus 432 may be configured to access audio data; determine a window of audio samples based on the audio data; input the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification, in which the classifier includes a neural network and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio that includes a speech class and a music class; select, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; apply the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification; and store, play, or transmit an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to determine, using the classifier, a secondary classification based on the window of audio samples; and select, based on the secondary classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to select, based on a classification and a secondary classification output by the classifier for another window of audio samples from the audio data, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to extract the audio data from AV data; and merge the enhanced audio signal with a visual track from the AV data. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to detect a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and input data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the classifier, in which the classification depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to detect a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and input data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the selected audio enhancement network, in which the enhanced audio segment depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to determine a sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples, including the window of audio samples, based on the audio data; determine a sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including the enhanced audio segment, based on the sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples using the classifier and at least two of the audio enhancement networks from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks; and determine an enhanced audio signal by blending the sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including combining (e.g., using weighted averaging) corresponding samples from multiple segments in overlapping portions of the enhanced audio segments. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to determine a residual noise signal as a difference between an audio signal from the audio data and the enhanced audio signal; and merge the enhanced audio signal with the residual noise signal. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to input the window of audio samples to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, in which the speaker identification network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users; and select, based on the speaker identification, the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a person associated with the speaker identification. For example, the processing apparatus 432 may be configured to input the window of audio samples to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, in which the speaker identification network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users; and select, based on the speaker identification, the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks, in which the selected audio enhancement network includes a speaker-specific embedding associated with the speaker identification. In some implementations, the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals that have been augmented using room acoustic models. For example, the speech enhancement network may be trained by implementing the process 700 of FIG. 7.

The computing device 430 includes a user interface 434. For example, the user interface 434 may include a touchscreen display and one or more speakers (e.g., headphones) for presenting video and/or messages to a user and receiving commands from a user. For example, the user interface 434 may include goggles or a headset with a display configured to support augmented reality applications. In some implementations, one or more speakers of the user interface 434 are used to play an enhanced audio signal generated by the processing apparatus 432 as part of an integrated audio enhancement and playback function.

The computing device 430 includes a network communications interface 436. The network communications interface 414 may enable access to AV data or other audio data stored on in the data storage 412 of the media server 410. For example, the network communications interface 436 may implement one or more network communications protocols (e.g., Ethernet, WiFi, SONET, 1Pv4 and/or 1Pv6 protocols). In some implementations, after an audio signal has been enhanced by the processing apparatus (e.g., by implementing the process 500 of FIG. 5), the resulting enhanced audio signal may be transmitted to the media server 410 via the network communications interface 436 for storage in the data storage 412.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an example of a process 500 for data driven audio enhancement. The process 500 includes accessing 510 audio data; determining 520 a window of audio samples based on the audio data; inputting 530 the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification; selecting 540, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks; applying 550 the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment; and storing, playing, or transmitting 560 an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment. For example, the process 500 may be implemented by the system 100 of FIG. 1, the system 300 of FIG. 3A, the system 330 of FIG. 3B or the system 400 of FIG. 4. For example, the process 500 may be implemented by a video capture device, such as the video capture device 310 shown in FIG. 3A. For example, the process 500 may be implemented by a computing device, such as the personal computing device 360 or the computing device 430.

The process 500 includes accessing 510 audio data. The audio data may be accessed 510 in variety of ways. For example, the audio data may be accessed 510 by reading directly from a microphone (e.g., the one or more microphones 316) or from a memory via a bus or other interconnect. In some implementations, one or more microphones used to capture the audio data may be part of an audio recording system (e.g., the video capture device 310, or the video capture device 340). In some implementations, the audio is accessed 510 directly from a microphone without intermediate signal processing. In some implementations, the image is accessed 510 after being subjected to intermediate signal processing (e.g., pass-band filtering or encoding and decoding). In some implementations, the audio data is accessed 510 by retrieving the audio data from a memory or other data storage apparatus. For example, the audio data may be accessed 510 by receiving audio data via a communications link (e.g., the communications link 350 or the network communications link 420). For example, the audio data may be accessed 510 via a wireless or wired communications interface (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB, HDMI, Wireless USB, Near Field Communication (NFC), Ethernet, a radio frequency transceiver, and/or other interfaces). For example, the audio data may be accessed 510 via the communications interface 366 or the network communications interface 436. For example, the audio data may be accessed 510 as an input audio signal, which may represent sound waves in a digital format, such as in a pulse-code modulated format. In some implementations, the audio data may be a one or more audio tracks of a video. For example, accessing 510 the audio data may include extracting the audio data from AV data (e.g., as one or more audio tracks stored as part of a video file). For example, accessing 510 the audio data may include decoding an encoded audio track (e.g., encoded in compliance with a standard, such as MP3 or AAC) to recover a pulse-code modulated audio signal.

The process 500 includes determining 520 a window of audio samples based on the audio data. For example, the duration of the window of audio samples may be fixed and may correspond to the size of an input layer of a neural network in classifier and/or in an audio enhance network. The duration (e.g., 1 second, 2 seconds, or 5 seconds) of the window of audio samples may be chosen to span multiple phonemes or words in a target language of speech to provide sufficient context for classification and/or audio enhancement processing. The duration of the window of audio samples may be chosen to be short enough to track fast changes in the type(s) of audio signals present in the audio data. In some implementations, the window of audio samples is of a longer duration than a corresponding enhanced audio segment that will be generated based on the window of audio samples. For example, the window of audio samples may extend before and/or after the endpoints of the a corresponding enhanced audio segment in order to provide look-back and/or look-ahead information to an audio enhancement network that is used to obtain the enhanced audio segment. For example, the window of audio samples may be determined as described in relation to the current window 610 of audio samples of FIG. 6A. In some implementations, determining 520 the window of audio samples is part of determining 520 a sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples, including the window of audio samples, based on the audio data. For example, a sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples may be determined 520 as described in relation to the window N 660, the window N−1 662, and the window N+1 664 of FIG. 6B. In some implementations, determining 520 a window of audio samples includes iteratively shifting the phase of a window of audio samples that is input to a classifier to search for more precise boundaries or transition times in the audio type classification and selecting the phase of one or more windows of audio samples based on a time offset of a detected transition in a classification of the audio type.

The process 500 includes inputting 530 the window of audio samples to a classifier to obtain a classification. The classifier may include a neural network (e.g., a convolutional deep neural network) and the classification takes a value from a set of multiple classes of audio. For example, the set of multiple classes of audio may include a speech class and a music class, and a corresponding set of multiple audio enhancement networks may include a speech enhancement network and a music enhancement network. For example, a layer of a neural network of the classifier may output a vector of class probabilities (e.g., a softmax function of class activations) with elements for the respective classes in the set of multiple classes. For example, a neural network of the classifier may be trained using labeled audio signal examples of types corresponding to the respective classes in the set of multiple classes.

For example, a secondary classification may be determined, using the classifier, based on the window of audio samples. In some implementations, the classifier also outputs one or more secondary classifications in response to inputting 530 the window of audio samples to the classifier. For example, the classifier may detect speech as a primary classification and background music as a secondary classification. For example, the classifier may detect music as a primary classification and background whispered speech as a secondary classification. For example, a primary classification may correspond to a class with a highest probability in a normalized classification vector and a secondary classification may correspond to a class with a probability in a normalized classification vector that is below a highest such probability and above a threshold (e.g., to a second highest probability on the normalized classification vector). In some implementations, the classifier may be trained with a corpus of audio signal examples that include naturally occurring mixes of audio types (e.g., speech over music or music over speech).

In some implementations, the classifier may take one or more classifications for previous windows of audio samples from the audio data as input and may determine a primary classification and/or one or more secondary classifications for the current window of audio samples based on the one or more previous classifications.

In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 5), a speech signal may be further classified by speaker. For example, an additional trained speaker identification classification network may be used to identify a most likely speaker. For example, a speech signal may be recognized as sourced from a known user (e.g., an individual from a predetermined catalog of possible speakers) that a classifier (e.g., including a neural network) has been trained to recognize. In some implementations, the window of audio samples is input to a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification. The speaker identification network may include a neural network that has been trained using speech signals from one or more users to recognize speech signals as uttered by one of the one or more users. In some implementations, a speech signal may be classified by a type of speaker (e.g., age, gender, and/or accent). In some implementations, tagging of with an indication of the speaker identification may be applied to corresponding AV data in a visual track of the video itself or in a side data structure.

In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 5), a speech signal may be classified based in part on detection of lip motion in a corresponding window of a visual track from AV data from which the audio data was extracted. For example, an image sequence from a visual track may be processed in tandem with the audio track, using standard face detection and tracking methods to isolate the lips of each speakers face. For example, the processing of the visual track may include decoding (e.g., according to a video coding standard, such as H.264 or H.265). Images of the lips and facial expression may be used, in conjunction with the noisy audio track to further disambiguate speech from noise. For example, video automatic speech recognition (VASR) algorithms may be employed. A speaker identification can also be reinforced with facial recognition for the speaker. For example, the process 500 may be augmented to include detecting a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples, and inputting data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the classifier, in which the classification depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips.

The process 500 includes selecting 540, based on the classification, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. In some implementations, the classification is a primary classification and the audio enhancement network is selected 540 based on the primary classification and one or more secondary classifications that are determined based on the window of audio samples using the classifier. For example, the audio enhancement network may be selected using a policy matrix (e.g., the policy matrix of Table 1 above) that maps a primary classification and one or more secondary classifications to a selection of an audio enhancement network. For example, the process 500 may include selecting 540, based on the secondary classification (e.g., in addition to the primary classification), the audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks. In some implementations, the selection of an audio enhancement network depends on a primary classification and/or one or more secondary classifications for another window of audio samples (e.g., a previous window and/or a subsequent window) in addition to the primary classification and/or one or more secondary classifications for the current window of audio samples. For example, the audio enhancement network may be selected using a policy matrix (e.g., a policy matrix of higher dimension than the 3×3 policy matrix of Table 1, representing permutations of the considered classifications) that maps the classifications considered to a selection of an audio enhancement network. For example, the process 500 may include selecting 540, based on a classification and a secondary classification output by the classifier for another window of audio samples from the audio data, an audio enhancement network from a set of multiple audio enhancement networks.

In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 5), a speech signal may be further classified by speaker and the audio enhancement network may be selected and/or modified based on the speaker identification. For example, once the likely speaker is identified by voice and/or facial recognition, the speech enhancement may be further improved by being swapping in a speaker-specific deep neural for speech improvement, or bring in a speaker-specific embedding (e.g., an “i-vector”) to a speech enhancement network trained to use speaker embedding information to further improve disambiguation of speech from noise. For example, the process 500 may include selecting 540, based on the speaker identification (e.g., in addition to one or more classifications), the audio enhancement network from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks. For example, the selected audio enhancement network may include a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a person associated with the speaker identification. In some implementations, the selected audio enhancement network includes a speaker-specific embedding associated with the speaker identification.

The process 500 includes applying 550 the selected audio enhancement network to the window of audio samples to obtain an enhanced audio segment. For example, the selected audio enhancement network may include a neural network that has been trained using audio signals of a type associated with the classification. In some implementations, the selected audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using audio signals (e.g., speech signals or music signals) that have been augmented using room acoustic models. For example, the selected audio enhancement network may have been trained by implementing the process 700 of FIG. 7. For example, the selected audio enhancement network may have been trained using the system 200 of FIG. 2.

In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 5), a speech signal may be enhanced based in part on detection of lip motion in a corresponding window of a visual track from AV data from which the audio data was extracted. For example, the process 500 may be augmented to include detecting a pair of lips in images from the visual track corresponding to the window of audio samples; and inputting data based on image portions depicting the pair of lips to the selected audio enhancement network, in which the enhanced audio segment depends in part on the image portions depicting the pair of lips.

If (at operation 555) there are more audio samples from the audio data to be processed, then a next window of audio samples is determined 520 and input 530 to the classifier to obtain a classification, and an audio enhancement network is selected 540, based on the classification, and applied 550 to the next window of audio samples to obtain a next enhanced audio segment. The process 500 may continue iteratively until (at operation 555) there are no more windows of audio samples to be processed. For example, the process 500 may include determining a sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including the enhanced audio segment, based on the sequence of partially overlapping windows of audio samples (e.g., as illustrated in FIG. 6B) using the classifier and at least two audio enhancement networks from the set of multiple audio enhancement networks.

The process 500 includes storing, playing, or transmitting 560 an enhanced audio signal based on the enhanced audio segment. For example, determining the enhanced audio signal may include blending the sequence of respective enhanced audio segments, including combining (e.g., using weighted averaging) corresponding samples from multiple segments in overlapping portions of the enhanced audio segments. In some implementations, where the audio data is extracted from AV data, the enhanced audio signal is merged (e.g., synchronized and encoded) with a visual track from the AV data and stored or transmitted 560 as part of enhanced AV data.

Multiple audio channels or tracks may be used to encode the enhanced audio signal and associated audio signals. For example, once the audio has been enhanced by removing noise and reverberation, the original audio can simply be discarded, as described above, or the audio can be factored into one or more tracks of clean audio and a second set of tracks containing the residual noise. A residual noise track may be computed by subtracting a clean track from a corresponding original track. These tracks may be conveniently represented as stereo channels, so that alternative mixes of audio can be recreated at the time of playback. In some cases, the listener may prefer slightly more noise in the mix if it creates, for a user, a better balance of the original feel of the audio and the reduced noise versions. For example, a residual noise signal may be determined as a difference between an audio signal from the audio data and the enhanced audio signal, and the residual noise signal may be merged with the enhanced audio signal. In some implementations, multiple audio tracks or channels may be used to encode enhanced audio signals corresponding to respective different speakers. In some implementations, an enhanced audio track is included along with a corresponding original, unenhanced audio track. Just as the system can be trained to identify specific speakers, audio tracks with multiple speakers, including overlapping speech, can be decomposed into single speaker tracks where each track attempts to capture the isolated, enhanced speech of just one of the speakers. For example, an enhanced speech segment may be tagged with a speaker identification that was used to select 540 a speaker-specific audio enhancement network for application to the corresponding window of audio samples. The speaker identification tags may be used to select a subset of the enhanced audio segments for inclusion in a speaker-specific audio track or channel.

For example, the enhanced audio signal may be transmitted 560 to an external device (e.g., the media server 410 or a personal computing device) for display or storage. For example, the enhanced audio signal may be stored 560 in memory of a processing apparatus (e.g., the processing apparatus 312, the processing apparatus 362, or the processing apparatus 432). For example, the enhanced audio signal may be played 560 in the user interface 320, in the user interface 364, or in the user interface 434. For example, the enhanced audio signal may be transmitted 560 via the communications interface 322, the communications interface 366, or the network communications interface 436.

FIG. 6A is an illustration of an example of audio enhancement processing 600 for a window of audio samples to generate an enhanced audio segment. An example structure of a deep neural network for speech enhancement is shown in FIG. 3. A current window 610 of audio samples is processed into a mix of temporal and spectral features used by the deep neural network 620 from which the output enhanced audio segment 630 is filtered and regenerated. The current window 610 of audio samples is proceeded in an audio signal by previous samples 612 and followed by future samples 614. For example, previous samples and/or future samples may be processed in previous or later windows in a sequence of windows of audio samples.

For example, an evaluation of the enhancement deep neural network may operate on an input span of 0.5 seconds to 2 seconds of noisy audio. This duration of the window creates an input audio context that spans multiple speech phonemes and even multiple words. By spanning more phonemes, the network has more contextual information to allow the model to capture statistically frequent sound and even word usage patterns in a target language. In addition, complex noise patterns can effectively be learned to assist in removal of these interferers. Together, the system may be enabled to disambiguate speech from noise more effectively and even partially reconstruct the more plausible missing speech sounds if they have been completely masked by noise. The system may operate on just the current input samples, and samples in the past, or may operate on current sample, and samples both before and after the current time. Looking ahead (e.g., by some hundreds of milliseconds) the accuracy can be improved, but also increases the latency of the processing system by the extent of look ahead.

FIG. 6B is an illustration of an example of audio enhancement processing 650 for overlapping windows of audio samples to generate overlapping enhanced audio segments. A current window N 660 of audio samples is processed into a mix of temporal and spectral features used by the deep neural network 670 from which the output enhanced audio segment 680 is filtered and regenerated. A previous window N−1 662 of audio samples is processed into a mix of temporal and spectral features used by the deep neural network 670 from which the output enhanced audio segment 682 is filtered and regenerated. A next window N+1 664 of audio samples is processed into a mix of temporal and spectral features used by the deep neural network 670 from which the output enhanced audio segment 684 is filtered and regenerated. The previous window N−1 662 of audio samples is proceeded in an audio signal by previous samples 666 and the next window N+1 664 is followed by future samples 668. For example, previous samples and/or future samples may be processed in previous or later windows in the sequence of windows of audio samples.

The deep neural network 670 is applied to overlapping input windows (660, 662, and 664) of audio samples. The input overlaps may be chosen to both provide sufficient context for speech reconstruction and to allow the output segments (680, 682, and 684) to overlap. For example, overlapping output windows may be combined by averaging the results sample by sample. Combining the overlapping enhanced audio segments may improve continuity with reduced audio artifacts in the enhanced speech output.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an example of a process 700 for training a speech enhancement network. The process 700 includes applying 710 a clean speech classifier to classify raw speech signals from a corpus of raw speech signals to select raw speech signals for inclusion in the corpus of clean speech signals; applying 720 room acoustic models to clean speech signals from a corpus of clean speech signals to obtain dirty speech signals; combining 730 noise signals from a corpus of noise signals with the clean speech signals; training 740 the neural network using the dirty speech signals as training inputs; and storing or transmitting 750 the neural network. For example, the process 700 may be implemented by the system 200 of FIG. 2, the system 300 of FIG. 3A, the system 330 of FIG. 3B or the system 400 of FIG. 4. For example, the process 700 may be implemented by a video capture device, such as the video capture device 310 shown in FIG. 3A. For example, the process 700 may be implemented by a computing device, such as the personal computing device 360 or the computing device 430.

The process 700 includes applying 710 a clean speech classifier to classify raw speech signals from a corpus of raw speech signals to select raw speech signals for inclusion in the corpus of clean speech signals. For example, the clean speech classifier may include a neural network that is trained to distinguish between high quality speech recordings and low quality speech recordings (e.g., using a corpus of speech examples labeled manually). In some implementations, the clean speech classifier may be configured to determine one or more objective quality metrics (e.g. Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ)) for the raw speech signals and select the raw speech signals for inclusion in the corpus of clean speech signals based on the one or more objective quality metrics (e.g., using one or more thresholds for the objective quality metrics).

The process 700 includes applying 720 room acoustic models to clean speech signals from a corpus of clean speech signals to obtain dirty speech signals. For example, a room acoustic model may be applied 720 to a clean speech signal using a convolution operation. For example thousands of different room acoustic models may be applied to the clean speech signals of the corpus of clean speech signals to generate a large augmented corpus of training signals, called dirty speech signals.

The process 700 includes combining 730 noise signals from a corpus of noise signals with the clean speech signals. For example, the noise may be combined with the speech by simple linear combination (additive noise) or may use a more complex combination function to represent the effects of microphone saturation or the Lombard effect. The noise signals may be collected from many sources for background noise (e.g., recordings from cafes, streets, construction sites, cars, airplanes, bars, and video and audio production sound effects). Common human-generated non-speech noises, such as laughter and applause may also be included in the noise corpus. In some implementations, a room acoustic model may be applied 720 separately to each of the speech and noise components, before combining these components, in order to approximate different speaker and noise source locations in the acoustic space.

In some implementations (not shown in FIG. 7), the noise signals may be combined 730 with the clean speech signals before the room acoustic models are applied 720 to the combined signals to obtain the dirty speech signals. This ordering of the training dataset augmentation operations may create realistic speech and noise interference mixes.

The process 700 includes training 740 the neural network using the dirty speech signals as training inputs with feedback based on a loss function comparing resulting enhanced audio signals to corresponding clean speech signals from the corpus of clean speech signals. For example, the loss function may be based on a Perceptual Objective Listening Quality Assessment (POLQA) score, a PESQ score, or a mean square error. For example, the neural network may be trained 740 using a stochastic deepest descent algorithm.

The process 700 includes storing or transmitting 750 the neural network. For example, the neural network (e.g., the model or state of the neural network) may be transmitted 750 to an external device (e.g., a personal computing device) for display or storage. For example, the neural network may be stored 750 in memory of a processing apparatus (e.g., the processing apparatus 312, the processing apparatus 362, or the processing apparatus 432) for later use to enhance speech signals. For example, the neural network may be transmitted 750 via the communications interface 322, the communications interface 366, or the network communications interface 436.

While the disclosure has been described in connection with certain embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation as is permitted under the law so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent arrangements. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: receiving audio data generated at a first client device; identifying, using a classifier, a first audio type and a second audio type as being represented in the audio data; selecting, based on at least the first audio type, an audio enhancement network from a group of audio enhancement networks; analyzing a portion of the audio data using the audio enhancement network, wherein the audio enhancement network is trained to at least one of enhance a first representation of the first audio type or reduce a second representation of the second audio type to result in enhanced audio data; and sending the enhanced audio data to a second client device.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the audio data is first audio data associated with a first channel of the first client device, further comprising: receiving, from the first client device, second audio associated with a second channel; and based at least in part on the second audio being received from the first client device, analyzing a portion of the second audio data using the audio enhancement network.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement network is based at least in part on the audio enhancement network being trained with training data of the first audio type.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: inputting the audio data into a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, the speaker identification network being trained using a speech signal from a user to recognize speech signals as being represented in received audio data, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks is based at least in part on the speaker identification, and the audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a speaker associated with the speaker identification.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein: the second audio type represents noise interference that is represented in the audio data; and analyzing the portion of the audio data using the audio enhancement network includes reducing the noise interference in the audio data.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the audio data is first audio data, further comprising: receiving second audio data generated at the first client device; based at least in part on the second audio data being generated at the first client device, selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks; and analyzing the second audio data using the audio enhancement network.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the second audio type in the audio data is an unwanted noise signal, further comprising: using the unwanted noise signal to train the audio enhancement network to identify unwanted noise signals in received audio data.
 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: inputting the audio data into a speaker identification network to identify a type of a speaker that uttered a speech signal represented in the audio data, the type of the speaker indicating at least one of an age, a gender, or an accent associated with the speaker, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks is based at least in part on the audio enhancement network including a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of speakers associated with at least one of the age, gender, or the accent.
 9. A system comprising: one or more processors; one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving audio data generated at a first client device; identifying, using a classifier, a first audio type and a second audio type as being represented in the audio data; selecting, based on at least the first audio type, an audio enhancement network from a group of audio enhancement networks; analyzing a portion of the audio data using the audio enhancement network, wherein the audio enhancement network is trained to at least one of enhance a first representation of the first audio type or reduce a second representation of the second audio type to result in enhanced audio data; and sending the enhanced audio data to a second client device.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the audio data is first audio data associated with a first channel of the first client device, the operations further comprising: receiving, from the first client device, second audio associated with a second channel; and based at least in part on the second audio being received from the first client device, analyzing a portion of the second audio data using the audio enhancement network.
 11. The system of claim 9, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement network is based at least in part on the audio enhancement network being trained with training data of the first audio type.
 12. The system of claim 9, the operations further comprising: inputting the audio data into a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, the speaker identification network being trained using a speech signal from a user to recognize speech signals as being represented in received audio data, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks is based at least in part on the speaker identification, and the audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a speaker associated with the speaker identification.
 13. The system of claim 9, wherein: the second audio type represents noise interference that is represented in the audio data; and analyzing the portion of the audio data using the audio enhancement network includes reducing the noise interference in the audio data.
 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the audio data is first audio data, the operations further comprising: receiving second audio data generated at the first client device; based at least in part on the second audio data being generated at the first client device, selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks; and analyzing the second audio data using the audio enhancement network.
 15. The system of claim 9, wherein the second audio type in the audio data is an unwanted noise signal, the operations further comprising: using the unwanted noise signal to train the audio enhancement network to identify unwanted noise signals in received audio data.
 16. The system of claim 9, the operations further comprising: inputting the audio data into a speaker identification network to identify a type of a speaker that uttered a speech signal represented in the audio data, the type of the speaker indicating at least one of an age, a gender, or an accent associated with the speaker, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks is based at least in part on the audio enhancement network including a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of speakers associated with at least one of the age, gender, or the accent.
 17. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving audio data generated at a first client device; identifying, using a classifier, a first audio type and a second audio type as being represented in the audio data; selecting, based on at least the first audio type, an audio enhancement network from a group of audio enhancement networks; analyzing a portion of the audio data using the audio enhancement network, wherein the audio enhancement network is trained to at least one of enhance a first representation of the first audio type or reduce a second representation of the second audio type to result in enhanced audio data; and sending the enhanced audio data to a second client device.
 18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media system of claim 17, the operations further comprising: inputting the audio data into a speaker identification network to identify a type of a speaker that uttered a speech signal represented in the audio data, the type of the speaker indicating at least one of an age, a gender, or an accent associated with the speaker, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks is based at least in part on the audio enhancement network including a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of speakers associated with at least one of the age, gender, or the accent.
 19. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media system of claim 17, the operations further comprising: inputting the audio data into a speaker identification network to obtain a speaker identification, the speaker identification network being trained using a speech signal from a user to recognize speech signals as being represented in received audio data, wherein selecting the audio enhancement network from the group of audio enhancement networks is based at least in part on the speaker identification, and the audio enhancement network includes a neural network that has been trained using speech signals of a speaker associated with the speaker identification.
 20. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media system of claim 17, wherein: the second audio type represents noise interference that is represented in the audio data; and analyzing the portion of the audio data using the audio enhancement network includes reducing the noise interference in the audio data. 